Collectives on Stack Overflow. Learn more. Installing Apache with Cygwin Ask Question. Asked 7 years, 11 months ago. Active 6 years, 4 months ago. Viewed 4k times. After that, I ran the following commands: cd httpd Can someone please provide some advice on what to do?
Thank you. Improve this question. HartleySan HartleySan 6, 12 12 gold badges 50 50 silver badges 94 94 bronze badges. I'm doing this more as an exercise, and I wanted to use Cygwin because it's a lot quicker and easier to set up than, say, Ubuntu.
Anyway, I will try my luck with finding the crypt files and report back. Again, I'm doing this purely as a brain exercise. Contributions are highly welcome please see TODO list ; please submit your code or suggestions to the bug report page, or join the dev httpd. The Win32 port of Apache is built on its own, custom code within Apache to assure interoperability with Windows operating systems. While it is considered release quality, it is slower and less thoroughly tested than the Unix ports.
The Cygwin port may suffer from gaps in security or reliability due to the interaction of the Cygwin compatibility layer with the native Windows API. The Win32 port will be more familiar to most Windows users. The Cygwin port including the build environment will be more familiar to Unix admins and developers. Due to these two different code bases, the security and reliability of the two ports are unrelated to each other. The Win32 port should be considered the more secure of the two at this time.
The Win32 port is recommended for most Windows users, however the Cygwin port offers an extra layer of compatibility for Unix developers. Apache still performs best, and is most reliable, on Unix platforms. Most of this document assumes that you have a working Cygwin installation and want to compile Apache yourself from the original distribution sources. Due to licensing issues there has not been an official binary distribution until Red Hat Inc.
Cygwin is supported in the official source distributions from Apache 1. Pre-compiled binaries for the Cygwin platform without the cygwin1. But there are considerable differences between the two flavors. Therefore we consider Apache for Cygwin closer to the Unix side then to the Windows side, even while it runs on Windows.
Most significant differences are the amount of changes to the source code needed to compile and run Apache on the Cygwin platform. While the native Windows port needs major changes and platform specific additions, the Cygwin based port changes are very small and most of the Unix source code can be used without major changes on the Cygwin platform.
The HBase Overview and QuickStart guides on the other hand go a long way in explaning how to setup HBase in more complex deployment scenario's. The following paragraphs detail the installation of each of the aforementioned technologies. You can download the latest versions for both from Sun's download page. Installation is a simple GUI wizard that guides you through the process. Cygwin is probably the oddest technology in this solution stack.
For installation, Cygwin provides the setup. To support installation, the setup. The cache must not be the same folder as the Cygwin root. Perform following steps to install Cygwin, which are elaboratly detailed in the 2nd chapter of the Cygwin User's Guide :. SSH will be provisioned on the target system via Cygwin, which supports running Cygwin programs as Windows services! Download the latest release of Apache HBase from the website. As the Apache HBase distributable is just a zipped archive, installation is as simple as unpacking the archive so it ends up in its final installation directory.
Following paragraphs explain eacht topic in detail. One important thing to remember in shell scripting in general i. So we try to stay away from spaces in path names.
Configuring SSH is quite elaborate, but primarily a question of launching it by default as a Windows service. So it's time to test it. The Win32 port of Apache is built on its own, custom code within Apache to assure interoperability with Windows operating systems. While it is considered release quality, it is slower and less thoroughly tested than the Unix ports. The Cygwin port may suffer from gaps in security or reliability due to the interaction of the Cygwin compatibility layer with the native Windows API.
The Win32 port will be more familiar to most Windows users. The Cygwin port including the build environment will be more familiar to Unix admins and developers. Due to these two different code bases, the security and reliability of the two ports are unrelated to each other. The Win32 port should be considered the more secure of the two at this time.
The Win32 port is recommended for most Windows users, however the Cygwin port offers an extra layer of compatibility for Unix developers. Apache still performs best, and is most reliable, on Unix platforms. Most of this document assumes that you have a working Cygwin installation and want to compile Apache yourself from the original distribution sources.
Due to licensing issues there has not been an official binary distribution until Red Hat Inc. Cygwin is supported in the official source distributions from Apache 1.
Pre-compiled binaries for the Cygwin platform without the cygwin1. But there are considerable differences between the two flavors. Therefore we consider Apache for Cygwin closer to the Unix side then to the Windows side, even while it runs on Windows. Most significant differences are the amount of changes to the source code needed to compile and run Apache on the Cygwin platform. While the native Windows port needs major changes and platform specific additions, the Cygwin based port changes are very small and most of the Unix source code can be used without major changes on the Cygwin platform.
0コメント